Stefanie M. Garibyan
カウンセル
Stefanie Garibyan’s practice focuses on complex intellectual property litigation, often involving patents, trademarks, and trade secrets, along with related contract and licensing disputes. Stefanie has trial and federal appellate experience, including her in-depth participation in, and substantive contribution to, the landmark Supreme Court decision in TC Heartland v. Kraft. She also has successful inter partes review experience before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Her practice spans various industries and has involved biopharmaceutical, consumer, automobile, software, and chemical technologies and brands.
Since 2021, Stefanie has been recognized by Best Lawyers on their list of “Ones to Watch,” including most recently in the 2025 Edition. Stefanie received her J.D., cum laude, from the University of Michigan Law School, and her B.S. in Bioengineering from SUNY Binghamton.
- University of Michigan, Law School, J.D., cum laude, 2014
- SUNY Binghamton, B.S., Bioengineering, 2011
- New York
- United States Patent & Trademark Office
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
- U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York
- U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
- U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- U.S. Supreme Court
- Hughes, Hubbard & Reed LLP, Intellectual Property Associate, 2014-2021
- American Intellectual Property Law Association, Member
- New York Intellectual Property Law Association, Member
- Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC v. TC Heartland, LLC, No. 14-028 (D. Del.), No. 16-341 (S. Ct.) (represented TC Heartland in district court, patent venue appeal, and inter partes review involving alleged infringement of three patents concerning Mio liquid water enhancer)
- Robert Bosch LLC v. Costco Wholesale Corp. et al., No. 12-574 (D. Del.) (represented Costco in district court and inter partes review involving alleged infringement of eighteen patents concerning windshield wipers)