• 日本語
    • English
    • 简体中文
Odegard Inc. v. Safavieh Carpets Inc., 398 F.Supp.2d 275, 78 U.S.P.Q.2d 1555 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)Odegard Inc. v. Safavieh Carpets Inc., 398 F.Supp.2d 275, 78 U.S.P.Q.2d 1555 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)Odegard Inc. v. Safavieh Carpets Inc., 398 F.Supp.2d 275, 78 U.S.P.Q.2d 1555 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)Odegard Inc. v. Safavieh Carpets Inc., 398 F.Supp.2d 275, 78 U.S.P.Q.2d 1555 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)
  • サービス
    • 特許
    • 商標
    • 著作権
    • 訴訟
  • 弁護士・弁理士
  • インサイト (Insights)
  • 弊所について
    • Careers and Diversity
    • Pro Bono
  • お問い合わせ
  • サービス
    • 特許
    • 商標
    • 著作権
    • 訴訟
  • 弁護士・弁理士
  • インサイト (Insights)
  • 弊所について
    • Careers and Diversity
    • Pro Bono
  • お問い合わせ
Ex Parte Joseph Ammirato et al., 2002 WL 31257862 (Bd.Pat.App. & Interf. 2002)
2002年2月 25日
Genal Strap, Inc. v. Dar, 2006 WL 525794 (E.D.N.Y. 2006)
2006年3月 3日

Odegard Inc. v. Safavieh Carpets Inc., 398 F.Supp.2d 275, 78 U.S.P.Q.2d 1555 (S.D.N.Y. 2005)

2005年11月 8日

Our Decisions banner
Peter Sloane participated in the successful representation of defendant against a claim of copyright infringement in plaintiff's carpet design inspired by an antique Japanese kimono. The court agreed that the appropriate test for substantial similarity was the "more discerning" ordinary observer standard because plaintiff's copyrighted design included many elements in the public domain. Under this stricter standard, plaintiff's copyright protection was limited to the particular selection and arrangement of the public domain elements. Consequently, the court granted summary judgment in favor of defendant and dismissed the case.
Download PDF
Share

カテゴリ

  • 記事
    • 特許法
    • 商標法
    • 著作権法
    • 広告法
  • 決定
    • 特許法
    • 商標法
    • 著作権法
  • リーソン・エリス ニュース
  • リーソン・エリス ニュースレター
  • カテゴリーなし
  • リーソン・エリス 動画
Print Friendly, PDF & Email
One Barker Avenue
White Plains, New York 10601
電話番号 914.288.0022
  • サービス
    • 特許
    • 商標
    • 著作権
    • 訴訟
  • 弁護士・弁理士
  • インサイト (Insights)
  • 弊所について
    • Careers and Diversity
    • Pro Bono
  • お問い合わせ
Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
  • ニュースレターを購読する
© 2022 Leason Ellis | クライアントポータル | プライバシーに関する声明 |免責事項 | 利用規約 | 弁護士広告
    We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept,” you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
    Cookie settingsACCEPT
    Privacy & Cookies Policy

    Privacy Overview

    This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
    Necessary
    常に有効
    Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
    Non-necessary
    Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
    保存して同意